Jump to content
Forums Gone... but not forgotten!

Tired of these Ads? Register Today!

  • Welcome to Forever Pontiac

    We are a community of Pontiac enthusiasts. The purpose of our community is to keep alive the Pontiac spirit by sharing (or showing off) our cars, discussing Pontiac, helping each other work on our cars and find information, plus attend various meets/shows/etc... To aid discussion, sharing, event planning and selling of parts/cars/anything, we have various parts of the website to aid this from Forums to an online Garage to Classifieds to even a Document Download Repository. You can find links to these in our navigation above based on what each section helps with (discussion, local events, learning, etc...).

    We invite you to contribute, find help or just view some of our member's amazing cars! Don't forget, we also have great contests from time to time (like our Pontiac of the Month and yearly calendar contest) and our Pontiac This OR That, a fun game where you choose the best of two randomly selected Pontiacs from our online garage.

    We look forward to seeing you around!


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Car and Driver: EPA Refines Guidelines for Fuel-Economy Testing, Promises Stricter Enforcement

Recommended Posts

Ford Focus MonroneyEarly last year, EPA compliance director Byron Bunker made it clear to carmakers that procedures related to fuel-efficiency tests would be strictly enforced. He specifically addressed the coastdown tests used to determine settings for the chassis dynamometers the EPA uses to check emissions compliance and to measure city and highway fuel economy. Now we know more specifics.


In 2011, manufacturers began supplying vehicles to the EPA so that the agency could verify the accuracy of the coastdown test results the companies had submitted. These tests are conducted on a level straightaway during low-wind conditions to assess a vehicle’s road load, which is comprised of aerodynamic drag, tire rolling resistance, and driveline friction. The results are used to program the indoor chassis dynamometers at the EPA lab to closely replicate ‘real-world’ conditions.


Past abuses of EPA procedures involved at least one automaker disabling the brakes at three wheels in order to reduce friction—yes, that means the test cars had only one operational brake—and extended engine idling prior to the commencement of coastdown testing to warm all the underhood driveline bearings and joints.


Starting with the 2017 model year, manufacturers must include detailed descriptions of their testing methods to the EPA defining exactly how they determined their road-load dynamometer settings. The EPA also has clarified the minimum allowable number of miles accumulated by the tires and specifications regarding the surface texture and composition of the test track.


Manufacturers dinged in recent years by the government for selling cars with inflated fuel-economy ratings include Ford, Hyundai and Kia, and Mitsubishi. The EPA began spot-checking manufacturers’ submissions in 2011 by conducting its own coastdown tests on roughly 10 percent of new vehicles, a small number limited by the EPA’s staffing and resource levels. Now in the event a discrepancy in road-load energy loss is discovered that exceeds 10 percent in city driving or 7 percent in highway driving, it will result in the correction of the mpg figures on a given vehicle’s window sticker. EPA spot checks have increased to 20 percent of the new-car fleet in recent years, and it’s highly likely that even more cars will be checked for the 2017 model year.


Read Full Article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tired of these Ads? Register Today!

Tired of these Ads? Purchase Enhanced Membership today to remove them!

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.