Jump to content
Forums Gone... but not forgotten!

Tired of these Ads? Register Today!

  • Welcome to Forever Pontiac

    Welcome to Forever Pontiac, full of great ideas for Pontiac performance, maintenance, or for peer-to-peer assistance from Professional and DIY mechanics. Also, compete in our Pontiac monthly competitions. Please register if you'd like to take part.


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Car and Driver: 2017 Honda Ridgeline Fuel Economy Tops Mid-Size Six-Cylinder Competitors

Recommended Posts

2017 Honda Ridgeline


A big part of the promise of a unibody pickup truck, as opposed the traditional body-on-frame designs favored by most every manufacturer, is a lighter curb weight—which should lead to better fuel economy. The first-generation Honda Ridgeline utilized a unibody design, but somehow missed the fuel-economy mark. That car’s successor, the 2017 Honda Ridgeline, on the other hand, lives up to its billing, if only just. The mid-size unibody truck’s EPA fuel economy estimates have been released, and they sit near the top of the mid-size class.


With all-wheel drive, the new Ridgeline is EPA-rated at 18 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway, numbers that sit above the 17/24 mpg salute given the six-cylinder Chevrolet Colorado 4×4 and the 18/23 mpg earned by the Toyota Tacoma V-6. For the first time, the Ridgeline will be offered with front-wheel drive, too. This is the most efficient Ridgeline configuration, as you’d expect, and is EPA-rated at 19 mpg city and 26 mpg highway. Again, this tops the six-cylinder mid-size competition, although the two-wheel-drive Colorado V-6 matches the Honda’s highway figure, but not its city or combined numbers.


We’re comparing to the V-6 models because the V-6-only Ridgeline doesn’t offer a base four-cylinder engine. Chevrolet and Toyota do, but Chevy’s base four-cylinder is offered only with rear-wheel drive. The two-wheel-drive, four-cylinder Colorado with the more efficient automatic transmission beats the Ridgeline with EPA figures of 20/27 mpg; the Tacoma with the same configuration rates a dismal 19/23 mpg.


Of course, the diesel four-cylinder in the Colorado is good for a stellar 22/31 mpg in two-wheel-drive form, with four-wheel drive dropping those figures to a still-great 20/29.


Given that full-size trucks these days are posting fuel-economy figures nearly as good as those of mid-size trucks, it’s worth noting that the Honda has every gas-powered full-size truck beat in the efficiency game save for the twin-turbocharged, 2.7-liter V-6–equipped Ford F-150 with two-wheel drive, which carries the same 19/26 mpg rating as the front-drive Ridgeline. Similarly, the diesel-powered Ram 1500 is EPA-rated for up to 20/28 mpg.


If the Ridgeline’s fuel economy doesn’t seem impressive at first blush, consider that it very nearly matches the efficiency of its sibling, the much-lighter-duty Pilot three-row crossover. It also handily beats the old Ridgeline’s ho-hum 15/20 mpg EPA estimates.


Read Full Article

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tired of these Ads? Register Today!

Tired of these Ads? Purchase Enhanced Membership today to remove them!

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.